OK. There i □□□□□□s no style, □□□□□□ and not ev □□□□□□en conventi □□□□□□onally safe □□□□□□ (not even □□□□□□a single es □□□□□□tablishing □□□□□□shot of the □□□□□□ vicinity - □□□□□□ WTF)? The □□□□□□cliched sto □□□□□□ry takes it □□□□□□self so ser □□□□□□iously with □□□□□□out adding □□□□□□anything ne □□□□□□w to the ge □□□□□□nre. Oh and □□□□□□ how can I □□□□□□not mention □□□□□□ its sexist □□□□□□ approach o □□□□□□n women? Pi □□□□□□ece of crap □□□□□□. □□□□□□